
The Ghana Airports Company Limited (GACL) has taken note of a recent opinion article titled
“Reconstruct Terminal 2: Don’t Refurbish the Past at the Expense of the Future.”
We acknowledge and appreciate the public interest in the development of airport infrastructure in Ghana, particularly at Accra International Airport.
The claim that the construction of Terminal 3 was based on Terminal 2 being obsolete is
false, misleading, and misconceived.
GACL’s decision to defer the renovation of Terminal 2 and instead construct Terminal 3 was based on a terminal planning study commissioned in 2013. At the time, Terminal 2 was the sole terminal for international operations and, as such, undertaking major reconstruction works within an active terminal would have resulted in:
It is important to emphasize that these considerations had nothing to do with Terminal 2 being obsolete or earmarked for demolition.
The overriding factor in the decision-making process was the need to avoid disruption to ongoing operations, as supported by the 2013 planning study.
The same study recommended the development of a connecting concourse between Terminals 2 and 3. Consequently, GACL opted to construct Terminal 3 as a new facility that would not interfere with existing operations.
This position was further supported by the Dorsch report (National Airport Systems Plan), commissioned by the Ministry of Transport and sponsored by the World Bank in 2014. The report anticipated that Terminal 2 would be refurbished and eventually integrated with Terminal 3.
It is therefore contradictory to suggest that a credible, World Bank-backed study would recommend connectivity with a terminal deemed obsolete or marked for demolition.
Contrary to claims of obsolescence, Terminal 2 has undergone incremental upgrades over the years. Notably:
These investments clearly demonstrate continued functional relevance, not abandonment.
Following the completion of Terminal 3, international operations were migrated to Terminal 3, while domestic operations moved from Terminal 1 to Terminal 2.
After eight years of Terminal 3 operations—and consistent with earlier planning recommendations—GACL, with ministerial approval, initiated the repurposing of Terminal 2.
For clarity:
Repurposing refers to converting a facility from its original use to a different function in response to evolving operational needs.
In this context, Terminal 2 is being transformed from a domestic-only terminal into a dual-use facility (domestic and international).
The suggestion that GACL is mischaracterizing refurbishment as repurposing is therefore misconceived and misleading.
Concerns that the repurposing of Terminal 2 will undermine the return on investment of Terminal 3 are unfounded.
References to the Public Financial Management Act 2016 and the Public Procurement Act 2003 are noted; however, claims of potential breaches are purely speculative.
GACL affirms that all processes relating to Terminal 2—from 2013 to date—have fully complied with applicable procurement and financial management laws. Due process has been strictly followed in all contracting and execution stages.
Assertions that Terminal 2 lacks modern aviation systems are incorrect. Even in its current state, Terminal 2 is equipped with:
Under the ongoing repurposing works, these systems are being significantly upgraded, including:
These upgrades place Terminal 2 among modern global standards, with technologies already in use in parts of the United States, Europe, and Asia.
GACL remains committed to transparency and will respond to requests in accordance with the Right to Information Act.
The repurposing of Terminal 2 is a strategic, cost-effective, and forward-looking decision that:
As such, GACL remains focused on delivering a modern, efficient, and competitive airport system that meets Ghana’s growing aviation needs.





